Square-1: The Beginner's Solution

solved square-1 cube scrambled square one

The Square-1 (previously called as Cube 21 and Back to Square One) is a shape-shifting three-layered twisty puzzle. Its solution is very unique because the kite-shaped corners and the triangular edges are indistinguishable to the puzzle's inner mechanism, meaning that corners can be swapped with edges and therefore it's possible to have 10 pieces in the upper layer while only 6 in the bottom.

The puzzle was invented in 1990 by Karel Hršel and Vojtech Kopský. It's an official WCA competition event, the fastest solution being held by Ryan Pilat (3.41 seconds).

Start the Square-1 Simulator

variations shape mods
Variations: Super Square-1, Square-2, Two Layered and Four Layered versions

How to solve the Square-1

The main idea of the solution is the same as the Rubik's Cube method: We divide the puzzle into layers and solve them one by one, not messing up the pieces already fixed. This puzzle has a completely different mechanism, so we have to introduce new notations and algorithms.

Notation

The top and bottom layers of a Square-1 are made of thin triangle edges and thick kite-shaped corner pieces. An edge piece is 30o (1 step), while a thick piece is 60o (2 steps) wide.

slice moveIn the algorithms we specify how many steps to turn the top and bottom layers between the slice moves.

/ - a slice is like a 180o R rotation on the Rubik's Cube (image). Square-1 scramblers usually neglect the slice move.
(1, 0) / - rotate the top layer 30o clockwise and slice
(0, 3) / - rotate the bottom layer 90o and slice. Equivalent to the D move on the Rubik's Cube.
/ (0, -1) / - start with a slice, rotate bottom layer 30o counterclockwise then slice again
(2, -1) / - rotate the top layer 2 steps, the bottom anticlockwise 1 step and do a slice

1. Bring the puzzle to a square shape

The puzzle is much easier to work with when it is in the shape of a cube. Try to bring the Square-1 to a cube shape in the first step. This is not a complicated stage because there are no solved pieces you can mess up. Use this step to familiarize with its operation.

make cube shape first
Try to group the small pieces together to form a cube with the method below

The two examples below describe how to make a cube from two easy-to-reach positions, when the thick pieces are collected in the bottom and the narrow pieces are grouped together on the top, as much as possible.

Case 1: If every small piece is grouped in the top layer
how to bring the square-1 to square shape

Case 2: If there's a lonely small piece in the top layer
how to solve the square-1

To bring the cube to a square shape first you need to collect the tiny pieces next to each other or leave maximum one lonely piece between two thick corners. This is not that hard to accomplish, it can be done intuitively. When this is done follow the steps on the pictures above. The black vertical line marks where to make the slice

Wrong middle layer

wrong middle layer

middle layer If the middle layer is not square, do the following: (0, -1) / (6, 0) / (6, 0) / (0, 1)

Now that the shape of the puzzle is a cube, we can easily handle the pieces.

2. Top (yellow) corners

First bring all corner pieces to the corresponding layer: Hold the cube with the red side facing you and the green on the right. The yellow has to come to the top and the white to the bottom. This step is not so complicated, it can be done intuitively, if not, here's a little help to swith two pieces in the top and bottom layers:

send top bottom corner
(0, -4) / (0, 3) / (0, 1)

When every corner is in the correct layer, bring the yellow corners to their final position, swithching two pieces in the top right side:

solve top corners

(1, 0) / (0, -3) / (0, 3) / (0, -3) / (0, -3) / (0, 6) / (-1, 0)

3. Edges to their layers

Yellow edges to the top, white edges to the bottom layer. To swap two pieces move them to the top right and bottom right of the cube then do the algorithm.

top bottom edge swap

(1, 0) / (0, -3) / (0, -3) / (-1, -1) / (1, 4) / (0, 3) / (-1, 0) 

Repeat this until every edge gets to its layer. It doesn't matter if they're not on the exact final spot. At the end of this step you should see the white and yellow faces solved.

4. Swap corners

In the second step we sent every top-layer corners to their final position. Now do the bottom corners. Use the trick below to swap the two front-facing corners in the bottom layer.

bottom corner swap
/ (3, -3) / (0, 3) / (-3, 0) / (3, 0) / (-3, 0) /

5. Permute the edges

At this point every edge should be at its correct layer, we just have to put them to their final position.

Switch two pieces on the top and two in the bottom layer at the same time. The algorithm below switches the right-top with the back-top edge and the right-bottom with the back-bottom edge.

permute edges
(0, 2) / (0, -3) / (1, 1) / (-1, 2) / (0, -2)

In most cases your Square One puzzle should be solved at the end of this step. If there are two edges that need to be fixed then you have a parity.

6. Parity

If there are only two edges left to finish the cube then you've got parity. Use this long algorithm to switch two edges on the top then go back to point 5.

parity
/ (3,3) / (1,0) / (-2,-2) / (2,0) / (2,2) / (-1,0) / (-3,-3) / (-2,0) / (3,3) / (3,0) / (-1,-1) / (-3,0) / (1,1) / (-4,-3)

Congratulations, you have solved your Square-1 cube puzzle!

Lubica Hlobikova
Good tutorial thank you. I got to step 5 and only have two edges at the top to solve, bottom is solved. The two edges at the top layer are one on front and one on the right-they need to be swapped.
If I do step 5 algorithm it solves the top layer, but I end up having same situation at the bottom layer.
Is there alg to swap only top layer edges?
피현우
Put bottom 2 part at right position and than swap top edges
Rolando Esteban Jelves Aguayo
In the step 5 (Permute the edges), there should be a final slice (/).
Thanks for this great site!
Dirk Reichel
Nope... but step 4 does ;)
Javiera Pinto
i don't understand the first step
Adrian Thomas-Prestemon
Basically, shuttle the pieces between top and bottom until you get the top to look like any of the items in the top row while the bottom looks like the items in the bottom row. If, on the top layer, every small piece is grouped, use the first set of images; if, however, the top layer has a single lonely small piece separated from a group of others, use the bottom set of images.

The most intuitive way (less memorisation, easier to figure out on your own) to do this is to just try to group six large (corner) pieces on one side and have the rest on the other side; this will result in your cube looking like the first pair in either the top or bottom sets of images. From there, you just align the top and bottom with the middle slice to look like the top and bottom of the pair matching your current cube configuration.
Rajeev Rao
Same here. There is no algorithm to get the square 1 into a cube shape
Matthew Fjbvuv
If you've solved a 3x3 before, you can think of it like doing the cross. There's no algorithm for it, but just playing around with your puzzle and seeing how it works will help you do it intuitively.
Dan Eastwood
Really nice and not so hard to remember algs. Only question, is there a shorter way or easier way to remember parity algoritm. I cant get it stuck in head.
Matt V. Sieredzinski
Reverse the Cube shape
Move the bottom piece once
Do the Cube Shap Alg
AND SLOVE
That how this works (I think
Jasnam Mansa
here's a faster alg for making the middle layer square. do / (6,0) 3 times.
Dante Dantee
how 2 permute the middle layer, blue and green are switched
Valerio Cestarelli
slice, rotate the middle layer 180°, slice again.
Logan Brunson
I have the bottom layer completely solved but 3 out of place on the top
Piotrek Karolczyk
Thank you so much, you'be saved me, turtotrial added to cune was so unclear
Nguyễn Khanh
is good thank you
Lindsay Knol-Rusch
So I've got parity on the top AND on the bottom ... It's driving me nuts
Andrew Brown
Did you figure it out...?
I think if you do half of the Edges to Layer:
(1,0) / (0,-3) / (0,-3),
then do the full Edges to Layer algorithm, then reverse the half-algorithm above, it might fix it. Maybe?
Nguyễn Quang Đức
/ (-3,3) / (0,3) / (-3,0) / (3,0) / (-3,0) /
Where is the last slash ? <swap corners>
Brian See
i dont understand the notation
Jackie Lin
The slash means to rotate right layer 180 degrees. The alg is grouped into coordinate groups, eg. (X,Y) X equals first layer, Y equals bottom layer. The numbers in X and Y tell you how many times to rotate it 30 degrees. For example if I had (4,6) then I would rotate the top 4 times clockwise and bottom 6 times clockwise. If there is a minus sign before the number that means to do it counter clockwise.
Eeva Rinne
I know even shorter parity algorithm, that does exactly what the one in the tutorial.
/ (3,3) / (-1,0) / (2,-4) / (4,-2) / (0,-2) / (-4,2) / (1,-5) / (3,0) / (3,3) / (3,0)
And the middle layer flip can be saved to the end.
I know even shorter algorithm for that.
/ (6,0) / (6,0) / (6,0)
João Alto
WOW!! Congratulations!!
You can exchange 3 edges in the bottom by using this algorithm.
/ (3,0) / (-3,0) / (3,0) / (-3,0) / + (1,-1) / +
/ (3,0) / (-3,0) / (3,0) / (-3,0) /
Do you know anything better? Please, answer on my facebook (Joao Alto) or e-mail [email protected]
Jon Jenkins
I'm not sure if this is part of the implicit Rubik's notation or not, but you should include the specific detail that when you do a slice your right hand rotates the cube and you are left hand and the left side of the cube remain stationary. This was a bit of a point of confusion at first, but I quickly figured out which way was correct. However you should clarify for people who are not experienced with twisty puzzles.
Eli Dosemagen
After I do parity I get a case that has two triangles that need to be swapped across from one another. Everything else is solved... HELP!
João Alto
I think it's missing an important algorithm. You can use this for changing 3 edges in the bottom. I din't find any other really better for such a porpose. It will make an exchange on the top too, but this wont bring much trouble for solving the puzzle.
/ (3,0) / (-3,0) / (3,0) / (-3,0) / + (1,-1) / +
/ (3,0) / (-3,0) / (3,0) / (-3,0) /
Nancy Marie
Do you know how to put the big pieces back on the puzzle? A couple of mine popped off.
Danny Ha
you can take the big piece apart and put it back in that way
Grattan Rowland IV
this tutorial does not cover the case where there are only two unsolved adjacent edges
Andrew Brown
I think it requires a combination of permutation and parity. You could also try João's algorithm below, which swaps three on the bottom, to try to get something that is in a better position for one of the above.
Charlie Rubin
so there is a way to avoid that. you have to make it so that when you swap them edge pieces, they are in a way that they are not adgacent.
피현우
Is it normal to having to do parity algorithm while solving?

i never solved it without parity algorithm